Review dan Sharing Dokumen Self-Assessment Report (SAR) Akreditasi ACQUIN
During the curriculum discussion session, the speaker highlighted several key issues. These included inconsistencies in the credit (SKS) allocation and recognition for undergraduate theses, which were considered disproportionate to students’ workload. The credit load for practicum courses was also criticized as being irrational. In addition, the integration of Islamic values into the curriculum must be clearly articulated, supported by implementation evidence in each course, and directly confirmed by students.
Academic references were another major concern. Core textbooks must be clearly identified, credible, and widely used internationally. A transparent and verifiable student grade appeal process must also be established. Alumni involvement in curriculum development should be tangible and relevant to graduates’ career fields. The speaker emphasized the importance of highlighting each study program’s uniqueness, aligning curricula with the Indonesian National Qualifications Framework (KKNI) and the European Qualifications Framework, and formulating more rational Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs) and Sub-PLOs—with an ideal standard of three PLOs and a maximum of eight Sub-PLOs.
In terms of student affairs, the discussion stressed the importance of selecting students with active English proficiency and strong academic performance. Participation in student organizations, inclusivity, transparency in the admission process, and the clarity of student support systems at the program, faculty, and university levels were also key points of concern. Such support includes services for students with special conditions, such as learning difficulties and psychological challenges. Furthermore, follow-up actions based on student satisfaction surveys must be clearly demonstrated, along with evidence of student involvement in curriculum development.
Through this activity, FITK UIN Sunan Kalijaga reaffirms its commitment to continuously strengthening academic quality and program governance, while ensuring institutional readiness to face international ACQUIN accreditation in a credible, measurable, and quality-oriented manner.